The European Educational Researcher

Distributed Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database (1981-2020)

The European Educational Researcher, Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2021, pp. 227-249
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 372 DOWNLOADS: 82 Publication date: 15 Jun 2021
ABSTRACT
Distributed Leadership is a conceptual and analytical approach to understanding leadership that is focused on interactions between leaders and those they lead with the goal of driving instructional improvement and improving student outcomes by developing high-quality teaching and an educational culture that enables all students to thrive. This article provides an overview of the state-of-the-art research available on distributed leadership. As new social and educational demands emerge, leadership responses need to be reformed at all school levels to ensure a school’s ability to provide a high-quality education. These transformations must be promoted from within each school center. The author describes and covers a deep review of the literature between 1981 and 2020. The source data for this research, (321 articles), is derived from SCOPUS, Biblometrix Studio, and VOSviewer. The terms and their clusters were illustrated on graphs, and density maps were utilized. General recommendations are provided and challenges are identified for the incorporation of DL changes into the management of schools. The findings show that the literature refers explicitly to DL, wherein there are a number of interesting insights provided by theoretical articles. A conclusion is given with recommendations for further multidisciplinary research at the intersection of the fields in order to show the holistic landscape of this field.
KEYWORDS
Bibliometric review, Bibliometrix analyzes R, Co-authorship, Distributed leadership, Keywords analyses, Science mapping, VOSviewer
CITATION (APA)
I.V., G.-C. (2021). Distributed Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database (1981-2020). The European Educational Researcher, 4(2), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.426
REFERENCES
  1. Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2018). Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis, European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE), 24(1), 42-52.
  2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.004
  3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: A R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
  4. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377-386.
  5. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
  6. Barnard, C. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard UniversityPress.
  7. Beck, A. P., & Peters, L. (1981). The research evidence for distributed leadership in therapy groups. International
  8. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31(1), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.1981.11492045
  9. Becker, H., & Useem, R. H. (1942). Sociological analysis of the dyad. American Sociological Review, 7(1), 13–
  10. 26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086253
  11. Benne, K. & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members, Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01783.x
  12. Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed Leadership. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
  13. Beaudry, C., & Lariviere, V. (2016). Which gender-gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Research Policy, 45(9), 1790–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.009
  14. Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research, International Journal of
  15. Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
  16. Bradford, S. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000407
  17. Brown, M., & Hosking, D. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations, 39(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001872678603900104
  18. Camburn, E., Rowan, B. & Taylor, J. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: the case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(4), 347-373. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F01623737025004347
  19. Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  20. Dahl, R. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
  21. De la Cruz del Río-Rama, M., Maldonado-Erazo, C., Álvarez-García, J., & Durán-Sánchez, A (2020). Cultural and natural resources in tourism Island: Bibliometric mapping. Sustainability 12(2), 724-744.
  22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020724
  23. Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package, Journal of Scientometric Res, 8(3), 156160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
  24. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R.L. (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, (pp. 19–38) y. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
  25. Etzioni, A. (1965). Dual leadership in complex organizations, American Sociological Review, 30(2), 688-698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091137
  26. Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressure in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing, Harper, New York.
  27. Follett, M. (1942/2003). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, Routledge, London.
  28. French, J., & Snyder, R. (1959). Leadership and interpersonal power. In: D. Cartwright (Ed.) Studies in Social Power. (pp. 118-149). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
  29. García, I. (2020). e-Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC) 13(1), 19-34 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v13i1.12341
  30. Gibb, C. (1954). Leadership (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  31. González-Álvarez, J., & Cervera-Crespo, T. (2017). Research production in high-impact journals of contemporary neuroscience: A gender analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 232–243.
  32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.007
  33. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis, Leadership Quarterly 13(4), 423-451. http://doi:org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)
  34. Gronn, P. (2003). The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform, Paul Chapman, London.
  35. Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership, Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235
  36. Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M., Gümüş, E., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: a bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578737
  37. Hallinger, P. & Kantamara, P. (2013). Leading at the confluence of tradition and globalisation: the challenge of change in Thai schools. Asia Pacific journal of education, 20(2), 45-57.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2000.10600182
  39. Hallinger, P., & Suriyankietkaew, S. (2018). Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Leadership,
  40. 1990–2018. Sustainability, 10(12), 4846-4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846
  41. Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401- 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401
  42. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2021). Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143219859002
  43. Hallinger, P., & Vien-Thong, N (2020). Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review, Sustainability, 12(5), 1947-1953, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947
  44. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801
  45. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863253
  46. Harris A. (2009). Distributed Leadership: What We Know. In: Harris A. (eds) Distributed Leadership. Studies in
  47. Educational Leadership, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, The Nederlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-97379_2
  48. Harris, A., & DeFlaminis, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, 30(4), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616656734
  49. Harris, A., & Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235
  50. Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833007-9048-4
  51. Harzing, A., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and crossdisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
  52. Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659-689.
  53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
  54. Heinicke, C., & Bales, R. F. (1953). Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 16(1), 7-
  55. 38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785953
  56. Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., & Jaya-Montalvo, M. (2020).
  57. Research Trends in Geotourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Scopus Database. Geosciences, 10(10), 379399. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100379
  58. Hoogendoorn, G. (2008). Scopus: The continuing development of an abstract and citation database. The Serials
  59. Librarian, 55(1-2), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801970899
  60. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  61. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations, Social Forces, 57(4), 1413–
  62. 1415, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/57.4.1413
  63. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement, Organizational
  64. Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5
  65. Louis, K., & Marks, H. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American journal of education, 106(4), 532-575.
  66. https://doi.org/10.1086/444197
  67. Mao, G., Huang, N., Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2017). Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol, 51(13), 7599-7605.
  68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.173
  69. Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306232
  70. Mehra, A., Smith, B., Dixon, A., & Robert-son, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly 17(3), 232-245.
  71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003
  72. Moed, H., & Glänzel, W. (2005). Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current
  73. Science, 89(12), 1990-1996. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24111059
  74. Mohamed, A., Abdul Razak, A., & Abdullah, Z. (2020). Most-Cited Research Publications on Educational
  75. Leadership and Management: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 4(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/1186/2046-4053-4-1
  76. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  77. Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Western Michigan University: Sage.
  78. Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers. Chandos Publishig.Cambridge, MA, United States.
  79. Samul, J. (2020). The Research Topics of Leadership: Bibliometric Analysis from 1923 to 2019. International
  80. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), 116-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.5036 Schein, E. (1988). Organizational Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  81. Scopus (2020). Content Coverage Guide, Elsevier: Amsterdam.
  82. Segura-Robles, A., Parra-González, M. E., & Gallardo-Vigil, M. (2020). Bibliometric and Collaborative Network
  83. Analysis on Active Methodologies in Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 259-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.575
  84. Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping, International
  85. Marketing Review, 33(3),327-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341 Spillane, J. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum 69(2), 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
  86. Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2001). Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed
  87. Perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
  88. Spillane, J., Halverson, R. & Diamond, J. (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective.
  89. Journal of curriculum studies, 31(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
  90. Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038545
  91. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review Introduction: The need for an evidence- informed approach. Br. J. Manag, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  92. Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969
  93. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The
  94. Leadership Quarterly Review of Leadership, 17(6), 654–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021). Automation of Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 136(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589
  95. van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285-320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  96. van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer.
  97. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2019). Manual for VOSviewer. University of Leiden, The Nederland.
  98. VOSviewer. (2020). https://www.vosviewer.com/
  99. Waltman L., & van Eck N. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12). 2378– 2392.
  100. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748
  101. Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco:
  102. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  103. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License