The European Educational Researcher

Children’s Interactions in Ability-based Groups in a Primary Classroom

The European Educational Researcher, Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2021, pp. 85-107
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 465 DOWNLOADS: 178 Publication date: 15 Jan 2021
ABSTRACT
The article reports data from an aspect of the study which aimed to study the nature of children’s interactions and their perceptions of ability-based groups in a primary classroom in England. Previous studies on ability-based group have mainly used quantitative research designs to study children’s interactions and appeared to award less opportunities to children to talk about their experiences of working in ability-based groups. This study has used qualitative ethnographic research design to study children’s interactions and their perceptions of working in ability-based groups. Children’s interactions were studied using participant observations and debriefing activities were used to elicit children’s perspectives on their recorded interactions. Furthermore, informal conversational interviews were also used to hear children’s perspectives on their experiences of working in ability-based groups. The article only focuses on data related to children’s interactions, which revealed that children appeared to be cooperative, non-cooperative and competitive towards their peers in ability-based groups. We noted that children interpreted the group structure and learning task distinctively when deciding whether or not to work with others in groups. In some cases, children exhibited gender-biased attitudes while interacting with their peers. Children showed cooperative attitudes towards same-sex peers and non-cooperative attitudes towards other-sex peers. The findings highlight the importance of fully understanding children’s contexts and their dynamic influences on children’s interactions during their routinely organised ability-based group work. These also highlight the importance of listening to children’s perspectives while studying their interactions in ability groups in the mainstream primary classrooms.
KEYWORDS
Ability-based groups, Children’s interactions, Ethnographic research, Primary classrooms
CITATION (APA)
Ambreen, S., & Conteh, J. (2021). Children’s Interactions in Ability-based Groups in a Primary Classroom. The European Educational Researcher, 4(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.415
REFERENCES
  1. Ambreen, S. (2017). Exploring the Influences of Social Backgrounds and Parental Concerns on Pupils’
  2. Participations in Ability Based Groups. In Conteh, J (Ed.), Researching Education for Social Justice in Multilingual Settings (pp.181-196). Bloomsbury publishing PLC.
  3. Ambreen, S. (2020). Children’s perspectives towards ability-based group work in a primary
  4. classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1811813
  5. Amanti, C. (2005). Beyond a Beads and Feathers Approach. In N. Gonzalez, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Ed.), Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities and Classrooms (pp. 29-46). Routledge.
  6. Baines, E., Blatchford, P. & Kutnick, P. (2008). Pupil grouping for learning: developing a social pedagogy of the classroom. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Ed.), The Teacher's Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom (pp.56-72). Springer.
  7. Baines, E., Davies, C. R. & Blatchford, P. (2009). Improving pupil group work interaction and dialogue in primary classrooms: results from a year-long intervention study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 95-117. doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701960
  8. Basit, T. N. (2012). '...But that's just the stereotype': gender and ethnicity in transition to Adulthood. Race, Ethinicity and Education,15, 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2011.624507
  9. Battistich, V. & Watson, M. (2003). Fostering social development in preschool and the early elementary grades through co-operative classroom activities. In R. M. Gillies, & A. F. Ashman (Ed.), Co-operative Learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp 19-35), Routledge.
  10. Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative Methods. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek.
  11. Bernard, H. R. & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analysing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Sage Publications.
  12. Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E. & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8
  13. Blommaert, J. & Jie, D. (2010). Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner’s guide. Mutilingual Matters.
  14. Boaler, J. (2005). The 'Psychological Prisons' from which They Never Escaped: the role of ability grouping in reproducing social class inequalities. Forum, 47(2), 135-144. http://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2005.47.2.2
  15. Boaler, J., William, D &. Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping-disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651583
  16. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: a future perspective. In P. Moen , G. H. Elder, & K. Lüscher (Ed.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development, American Psychological Association.
  17. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications
  18. Conteh, J. (2015). Funds of Knowledge for Achievement and Success: Multilingual Pedagogies for Mainstream Primary Classrooms in England. In C. J. Jenks & P. Seedhouse (Ed.), International Perspectives on ELT Classroom Interaction (pp 49-63), Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137340733
  19. Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society. Association for Bilingual Education. urn: oclc:record:1150808237
  20. Dijk, T, A, V. (2011). Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Sage Publications Ltd.
  21. Dolores, M., Tongco, C. (2007). Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5, 147-158. DOI:10.17348/ERA.5.0.147-158
  22. Dracup, T. 2014. The Politics of Setting. Retrieved from https://giftedphoenix.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/the-politicsof-setting/.
  23. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2005). Higher Standards, Better Schools for All: More Choice for Parents and Pupils. London: HMSO.
  24. Ericsson, K. A. (2003). The Search for General Abilities and Basic Capacities: Theoretical Implications from the Modifiability and Complexity of Mechanisms Mediating Expert Performance. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenk (Ed.), The psychology of Abilities Competencies and Expertise (pp 93-124). Cambridge university press.
  25. Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., Alkassim, R.S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  26. Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Taylor, B. & Travers, M.-C. (2016). Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England: a discourse analytic account. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1093095
  27. Galton, M. & Hargreaves, L. (2009). Group work: still a neglected art? Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 1-6. doi.org/10.1080/03057640902726917
  28. Galton, M. & Williamson, J. (1992). Group Work in the Primary Classroom. Routledge.
  29. Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. Routledge.
  30. Gillies, R. M. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Developments in Research. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 125-140. doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2014.08
  31. Gillies, R. M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, (1-2), 35-49. doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7
  32. Gillies, R. M. & Boyle, M. (2008). Teachers’ discourse during cooperative learning and their perceptions of this pedagogical practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1333-1348. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.003
  33. Gillies, R.M. & Haynes, M. (2011). Increasing explanatory behaviour, problem-solving, and reasoning within classes using cooperative group work. Instructional Science, 39(6), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9130-9
  34. Gillies, R. & Khan, A. (2009). Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 7-27. doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701945
  35. Gonzalez, N. (2005). Beyond Culture: The Hybridity of Funds of Knowledge. In N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Ed.), Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities and Classrooms (pp 29-46), Routledge.
  36. Gamoran, A. (2002). Standards, Inequality & Ability Grouping in Schools. Retrieved from: http://www.ces.ed.ac.uk.
  37. Hammersely, M. & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Routledge.
  38. Hallam, S. & Ireson, J. (2007). Secondary School Pupils' Satisfaction with Their Ability Grouping Placements. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920601104342
  39. Hallam, S. (2012). Streaming and Setting in UK Primary Schools: Evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study. Forum: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 54(1), 57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/forum.2012.54.1.57
  40. Hart, S., Dixon, A., Drummond, M. J. & Mclntyre, D. (2004). Learning without Limits. Open University Press.
  41. Hargreaves, E. (2019). Feeling Less than Other People: Attainment Scores as Symbols of Children’s Worth. Forum: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 16(1), 53-66. http://doi.org/10.15730/forum.2019.61.1.53
  42. Holmes, G. R. (2019). School readiness, governance and early years ability grouping. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119863128
  43. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Thurston, A., Topping, K., Christie, D., Livingston, K., Jessiman, E. & Donaldson, C. (2007). Group work in Elementary Science: Towards organizational principles for supporting pupil learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5): 549- 563. doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.004
  44. James, A., Jenks, C. and Prout, A. (1998). Theorising childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  45. James, A., & James, Adrian L. (2012). Key concepts in childhood studies (Second Edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  46. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta‐analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105. doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110
  47. Jones, J. S. & Watt, S. (2010). Ethnography in Social Science Practice. Taylor & Francis Group.
  48. King, A. (2008). Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote Higher-Order Thinking and Complex Learning in Cooperative Groups. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwal (Ed.), The Teacher's Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom (pp 73-91), Springer.
  49. Kellett, M. (2010). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. London: Continuum.
  50. Madden, R. (2017). Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. Sage Publications Ltd.
  51. Marks, R. (2013). The Blue Table Means You Don't Have a Clue: The persistence of fixed-ability thinking and practices in primary mathematics in English schools. Forum: 3-19 comprehensive education, 55(1), 31-44. DOI: 10.2304/forum.2013.55.1.31
  52. Mayall, B. (2008). Working with generational issues: conversation with children. In: Christensen, P. & James, A. (eds), Research with Children: Perspective and Practices (pp 109-121), Routledge.
  53. Mehta, C. M. & Strough, J. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29(3), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001
  54. Rice, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Oxford University Press.
  55. Ross, J. A. (2008). Explanation Giving and Receiving in Cooperative Learning Groups. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwal (Ed.), The Teacher's Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom (pp 222-237). Springer
  56. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting Early Adolescents’ Achievement and Peer Relationships: The Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures. American Psychological Association, 134(2), 223-246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223.
  57. Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W. & Jong, T. D. (2007). Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning, and motivation of average-ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.001
  58. Taylor, B., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Tereshchenko, A. & Travers, M.-C. (2016). Factors deterring schools from mixed attainment teaching practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25, 3, 327-345, DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2016.1256908
  59. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Tondra, D., Angela, G.C., Freund, D., Shein, P. & Melkonian, D. K. (2009). Explain to your partner: teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49-70. doi: org/10.1080/03057640802701986
  60. William, D. & Bartholomew, H. (2004). It's Not Which School but Which Set You're in That Matters: The Influence of Ability Grouping Practices on Student Progress in Mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000195245
  61. Woolfolk, A., Hughes, M. & Walkup, V. (2013). Psychology in Education. Pearson.
  62. Yarker, P. (2013). Can I have me on here?: 'ability' and the language of pupil-progress. FORUM: For Promoting 3-19 Comprehensive Education, 55(1), 153-160. doi: http://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2013.55.1.153
  63. Wyness, M. (2011). Childhood and society. Macmillan International Higher Education.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License